Categories: राजनीति

Mamata Banerjee’s Election Petition Assigned to New Calcutta HC Judge


File photo of Bengal Chief minister Mamata Banerjee. (PTI)

The matter is likely to be listed before the court of Justice Sarkar on Wednesday, the sources said.

  • PTI Kolkata
  • Last Updated:July 12, 2021, 23:36 IST
  • FOLLOW US ON:

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee’s election petition before the Calcutta High Court challenging BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari’s victory from Nandigram constituency in the assembly elections has been assigned to the bench of Justice Shampa Sarkar, court sources said here on Monday. The matter is likely to be listed before the court of Justice Sarkar on Wednesday, the sources said.

Justice Kausik Chanda had on July 7 recused from hearing the Trinamool Congress supremo’s petition challenging the election of Adhikari from Nandigram, and imposed a cost of Rs five lakh on her for the manner in which the recusal was sought. Acting Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal assigned the matter to the court of Justice Sarkar.

Adhikari defeated Banerjee from the Nandigram constituency by 1,956 votes in the assembly election held earlier in the year. Releasing the election petition of Banerjee on an application by her for recusal expressing apprehension of bias against her by his bench, Justice Chanda had said that he was doing so in order to thwart at the outset attempts by trouble-mongers to keep the controversy alive.

Banerjee’s lawyers had suggested that Justice Chanda should recuse himself from the case since he was associated with the legal cell of the BJP before his elevation as a Judge and had appeared in a number of cases on behalf of the said party before the high court as a lawyer. Her lawyer had suggested during his submissions before the court that there is a conflict of interest since Justice Chanda had a close relationship with the BJP and the petitioner has challenged the election of a BJP candidate.

In its order, the court had said that it is preposterous to suggest that a judge having a past association with a political party as a lawyer should not receive a case involving the said political party or any of its members. Justice Chanda had noted that like any other citizen of the country, a judge also exercises his voting rights in favour of a political party, but he lays aside his individual predilection while deciding a case.

Read all the Latest News, Breaking News and Coronavirus News here

.

News India24

Share
Published by
News India24

Recent Posts

जम्मू-कश्मीर: नेकां सांसद आरक्षण नीति को लेकर मुख्यमंत्री अब्दुल्ला के आवास के बाहर अपनी ही सरकार के खिलाफ विरोध प्रदर्शन में शामिल हुए

जम्मू एवं कश्मीर समाचार: जम्मू-कश्मीर में विवादास्पद आरक्षण नीति को लेकर सीएम आवास के बाहर…

3 hours ago

पूर्व सीएसके खिलाड़ी ने एमएस धोनी के भविष्य पर अपने विचार रखे, टीम के ड्रेसिंग रूम के माहौल पर खुलकर बात की | अनन्य

छवि स्रोत: आईपीएल रिचर्ड ग्लीसन और डेरिल मिशेल। चेन्नई सुपर किंग्स के लिए खेलना कई…

5 hours ago

गणतंत्र दिवस पर इन राज्यों/मंत्रालयों की निकलेगी हंकी, जानें क्या है इस बार की थीम – इंडिया टीवी हिंदी

छवि स्रोत: पीटीआई/फ़ाइल कर्तव्य पथ पर 15 राज्यों और केंद्र उद्यमियों की निकासी होगी। नई…

5 hours ago

विनोद कांबली के दिमाग में खून के थक्के हैं, डॉक्टर ने मेडिकल जांच के बाद खुलासा किया

भारत के पूर्व क्रिकेटर विनोद कांबली को ठाणे जिले के एक निजी अस्पताल में भर्ती…

5 hours ago

महाकुंभ 2025: दिल्ली से महाकुंभ मेले के लिए कौन सी ट्रेन चलाने वाली हैं और उनका समय – इंडिया टीवी हिंदी

छवि स्रोत: सामाजिक महाकुंभ मेला महाकुंभ मेला विश्वभर में अपनी भव्यता के लिए प्रसिद्ध है।…

5 hours ago